[#56333] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723][Open] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. — "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" <onurtugcu@...>
[#56368] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8730][Open] "rescue Exception" rescues Timeout::ExitException — "takiuchi (Genki Takiuchi)" <genki@...21g.com>
2013/8/28 nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) <nobu@ruby-lang.org>:
[#56389] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8738][Open] Integer#single_bit? (Actually Fixnum#single_bit? and Bignum#single_bit?) — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
[#56407] [ruby-trunk - misc #8741][Open] email notification on bugs.ruby-lang.org is broken — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>
[#56517] Re: [ruby-cvs:49638] zzak:r42496 (trunk): * lib/time.rb: [DOC] Document constants by @markijbema [Fixes GH-377] — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/8/11 <zzak@ruby-lang.org>:
[#56523] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8769][Open] [PATCH] process.c (rb_fork_internal): remove cloexec setting — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
[#56524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8770][Open] [PATCH] process.c: avoid EINTR from Process.spawn — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
[#56536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8772][Open] Hash alias #| merge, and the case for Hash and Array polymorphism — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>
[#56551] [CommonRuby - Feature #8777][Open] Process.mach_absolute_time — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <tenderlove@...>
[#56567] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8780][Assigned] DBM#to_h alias for #to_hash — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...>
[#56569] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781][Open] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 07:17:50AM +0900, trans (Thomas Sawyer) wrote:
(13/08/17 13:13), Aaron Patterson wrote:
(2013/08/12 15:35), ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:
(2013/08/13 2:25), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:38:01AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
(2013/08/16 14:21), Aaron Patterson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
Em 16-08-2013 03:24, Aaron Patterson escreveu:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:35:04AM -0300, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#56634] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8788][Open] use eventfd on newer Linux instead of pipe for timer thread — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
(2013/08/16 10:47), normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Hi
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#56658] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8796][Open] Use GMP to accelerate Bignum operations — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
[#56672] Re: [ruby-cvs:49733] eregon:r42591 (trunk): * process.c (rb_clock_gettime): document CLOCK_REALTIME and — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/8/17 <eregon@ruby-lang.org>:
On 17 August 2013 02:52, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#56746] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8803][Open] Another buffer overflow — "user021 (a s)" <user021@...>
[#56753] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8804][Open] ONCE syntax — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#56762] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8805][Open] Ruby GC::Profiler returns incorrect info on Solaris (and relatives) — "sax (Eric Saxby)" <sax@...>
[#56780] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8809][Open] Process.clock_getres — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
[#56795] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8816][Open] Tempfile.new may return the same name for parallel calls — "375gnu (Hleb Valoshka)" <redmine@...>
[#56809] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8820][Open] Speed up Array#index — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>
"trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
2013/8/27 ko1 (Koichi Sasada) <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#56839] [ANN] Ruby Developer Meeting 20130831 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Hi,
Hi,
[#56861] [ruby-trunk - Feature #3620] Add Queue, SIzedQueue and ConditionVariable implementations in C in addition to ruby ones — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#56866] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8834][Open] Kernel#load_relative — "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
[#56890] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8839][Open] Class and module should return the class or module that was opened — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#56894] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8840][Open] Yielder#state — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#56911] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8846][Open] Publicize Module#include — "matsuda (Akira Matsuda)" <ronnie@...>
[ruby-core:56378] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7106] FileUtils.touch should allow touching the symlink itself rather than the file the link points to
Can you just write a gem? On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:24 PM, "kwilczynski (Krzysztof Wilczynski)" <krzysztof.wilczynski@linux.com> wrote: > > Issue #7106 has been updated by kwilczynski (Krzysztof Wilczynski). > > > When talking about accepting it ... two things to consider as patch has two parts, really: > > Part 1 - Adding support for lutimes on *nix/POSIX operating systems[*]; > Part 2 - Changing FileUtils accordingly to accommodate for File getting new methods; > > As Luis proven in the past, adding Windows (_WIN32 et al) support might be non-trivial. That having said, I can amend the patch to return NonImplementedError on Windows - not sure how much trouble it is to add support for Windows family (citation needed). > > So, even if we consider FileUtils being frozen due to lack of maintainer and Windows implementation for entire Windows family being complex (at this point at least), then perhaps we could separate concerns here and include lutimes patch for *nix/POSIX and return NotImplementedError for Windows for the time being, and then get FileUtils and proper Windows support in check. > > What do you guys think? > ---------------------------------------- > Feature #7106: FileUtils.touch should allow touching the symlink itself rather than the file the link points to > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7106#change-40810 > > Author: cirrusthinking (Alessandro Diaferia) > Status: Open > Priority: Normal > Assignee: > Category: core > Target version: next minor > > > Most systems support POSIX lutimes sys call that allows a symlink to be touched. I'd like to see this feature implemented. > Unfortunately I'd like to see this feature on Solaris as soon as possible but I cannot see lutimes syscall supported there. > > > -- > http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ >