[#54777] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8368][Open] Socket.getifaddrs — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
6 messages
2013/05/04
[#54784] Call setlocale(LC_ALL, "") instead of setlocale(LC_CTYPE, "") — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Hi!
6 messages
2013/05/04
[#54786] Re: Call setlocale(LC_ALL, "") instead of setlocale(LC_CTYPE, "")
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/05/04
2013/5/5 Nikolai Weibull <now@disu.se>:
[#54800] Re: Call setlocale(LC_ALL, "") instead of setlocale(LC_CTYPE, "")
— Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
2013/05/05
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#54810] Re: Call setlocale(LC_ALL, "") instead of setlocale(LC_CTYPE, "")
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/05/05
>> I think it is acceptable that make ruby more robust.
[#54850] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8377][Open] Deprecate :: for method calls in 2.1 — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>
27 messages
2013/05/07
[#54915] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8377] Deprecate :: for method calls in 2.1
— "jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans)" <merch-redmine@...>
2013/05/11
[#54924] Re: [ruby-changes:28599] hsbt:r40651 (trunk): fixed wrong document for Socket.tcp by @lann [fix GH-302] — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/5/12 hsbt <ko1@atdot.net>:
4 messages
2013/05/12
[#54939] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8399][Open] Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed — "dbussink (Dirkjan Bussink)" <d.bussink@...>
32 messages
2013/05/12
[#55001] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8399] Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
— "dbussink (Dirkjan Bussink)" <d.bussink@...>
2013/05/15
[#55004] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #8399] Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/05/15
(2013/05/15 14:38), dbussink (Dirkjan Bussink) wrote:
[#55053] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8426][Open] Implement class hierarchy method caching — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>
21 messages
2013/05/19
[#55077] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8426][Open] Implement class hierarchy method caching
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/05/20
Great work!
[#55083] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8426][Open] Implement class hierarchy method caching
— Charlie Somerville <charlie@...>
2013/05/20
On Monday, 20 May 2013 at 1:35 PM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#55085] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8426][Open] Implement class hierarchy method caching
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/05/20
(2013/05/20 18:21), Charlie Somerville wrote:
[#55058] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5458] DL should be removed — "luislavena (Luis Lavena)" <luislavena@...>
3 messages
2013/05/19
[#55068] Re: [ruby-cvs:48003] zzak:r40834 (trunk): * lib/pp.rb: Document PP::ObjectMixin [Fixes GH-312] — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/5/20 <zzak@ruby-lang.org>:
7 messages
2013/05/20
[#55071] Re: [ruby-cvs:48003] zzak:r40834 (trunk): * lib/pp.rb: Document PP::ObjectMixin [Fixes GH-312]
— Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
2013/05/20
@akr Oh, thank you for pointing that out!
[#55072] Re: [ruby-cvs:48003] zzak:r40834 (trunk): * lib/pp.rb: Document PP::ObjectMixin [Fixes GH-312]
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/05/20
2013/5/20 Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>:
[#55073] Re: [ruby-cvs:48003] zzak:r40834 (trunk): * lib/pp.rb: Document PP::ObjectMixin [Fixes GH-312]
— Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
2013/05/20
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#55075] Re: [ruby-cvs:48003] zzak:r40834 (trunk): * lib/pp.rb: Document PP::ObjectMixin [Fixes GH-312]
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/05/20
2013/5/20 Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>:
[#55096] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8430][Open] Rational number literal — "mrkn (Kenta Murata)" <muraken@...>
28 messages
2013/05/21
[#55197] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8461][Open] Easy way to disable certificate checking in XMLRPC::Client — "herwinw (Herwin Weststrate)" <herwin@...>
11 messages
2013/05/29
[#55198] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8462][Open] Module.remove_const inconsistant naming — "kyledecot (Kyle Decot)" <kyle.decot@...>
7 messages
2013/05/29
[ruby-core:55023] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #6721] Object#yield_self
From:
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Date:
2013-05-17 08:48:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #55023
(13/05/17 17:01), aleph1 (Elias Levy) wrote:
> map may be the best choice, as its already used in enumerables and this is a natural equivalent for single objects. That said, it may lead to unnoticed bugs if someone thinks they are applying a map operation on an enumerable but for some reason they do so against some other object. So maybe one of the other names is better to ensure such cases fail.
If it were Kernel#map, which would you expect by `{foo: 42}.map {...}` ?