[#50466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7492][Open] Segmentation fault at DL::TestDL#test_call_double on x64 Windows 8 — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>
23 messages
2012/12/02
[#59083] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7492] Segmentation fault at DL::TestDL#test_call_double on x64 Windows 8
— "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>
2013/12/13
[#50483] [IMPORTANT] 2.0.0 release plan — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
ALL COMMITTERS SHOULD READ THIS MAIL! コミッタはこのメール読んで!
5 messages
2012/12/02
[#50561] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7513][Open] TracePoint#enable/disable should not cause error — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
7 messages
2012/12/05
[#50575] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7517][Open] Fixnum::MIN,MAX — "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...>
20 messages
2012/12/05
[#50593] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7517] Fixnum::MIN,MAX
— "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
2012/12/05
[#50594] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7517] Fixnum::MIN,MAX
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/12/05
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:24 PM, shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)
[#50636] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7528][Open] CSV.== fails to check object type — "SteveW (Stephen Wattam)" <stephenwattam@...>
6 messages
2012/12/06
[#50660] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
3 messages
2012/12/07
[#50699] Commit access for Yehuda Katz — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2012/12/08
[#50923] Re: Commit access for Yehuda Katz
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/12/16
I will +1 this, unsure if it has happened already (it's "catch up on
[#50733] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7539][Open] Misleading error message "can't convert nil into string" — "connec (Chris Connelly)" <chris@...>
8 messages
2012/12/10
[#50755] Becoming a committer — Charlie Somerville <charlie@...>
Hi ruby-core,
21 messages
2012/12/11
[#50759] Re: Becoming a committer
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2012/12/11
Hi,
[#50784] Re: Becoming a committer
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/12/11
It's really this easy? If so, I'll send over my public key today :)
[#50795] Re: Becoming a committer
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2012/12/11
Hi,
[#50797] Re: Becoming a committer
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/12/11
I guess there's a few things I'd be interested in:
[#50809] Re: Becoming a committer
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/12/12
(2012/12/12 8:55), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#50815] Re: Becoming a committer
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/12/12
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:04 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#50816] Re: Becoming a committer
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2012/12/12
2012/12/12 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#50817] Re: Becoming a committer
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/12/12
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:59 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#50765] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7544][Open] Accented characters in IRB — cfabianski (Cédric FABIANSKI) <cfabianski@...>
6 messages
2012/12/11
[#50793] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7547][Open] Dir.mktmpdir('~something') tries to expand a profile directory — "jstanley0 (Jeremy Stanley)" <jeremy@...>
4 messages
2012/12/11
[#50810] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7549][Open] A Ruby Design Process — "brixen (Brian Ford)" <brixen@...>
34 messages
2012/12/12
[#50829] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7549] A Ruby Design Process
— "subwindow (Erik Peterson)" <erik@...>
2012/12/12
[#50837] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7549] A Ruby Design Process
— "subwindow (Erik Peterson)" <erik@...>
2012/12/12
[#50867] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7556][Assigned] test error on refinement — "usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)" <usa@...>
14 messages
2012/12/13
[#50900] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7564][Open] r38175 introduces incompatibility — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
14 messages
2012/12/14
[#50913] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7568][Open] Yaml fails to encode zero date string. — "anshul (Anshul Khandelwal)" <anshul@...>
5 messages
2012/12/15
[#50920] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7568][Assigned] Yaml fails to encode zero date string.
— "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charlie@...>
2012/12/16
[#50988] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7568][Assigned] Yaml fails to encode zero date string.
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2012/12/19
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:53:14PM +0900, charliesome (Charlie Somerville) wrote:
[#51015] 1.9.3 patch level release — Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
I know unak-san was asking about a 1.9.3 patch level release, so I
8 messages
2012/12/20
[#51099] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7612][Open] Enumerators take a proc — "pedz (Perry Smith)" <pedz@...>
4 messages
2012/12/23
[ruby-core:50670] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods
From:
"rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
Date:
2012-12-07 18:48:01 UTC
List:
ruby-core #50670
Issue #4085 has been updated by rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas).
Charles will know for the JRuby case but if it currently doesn't differentiate blocks from procs (or lambdas) I guess they should be able to. If you think raising an ArgumentError for this case would be the best solution for now, then I'd much prefer to have this behavior than something that is implementation specific.
I don't really think Charles would prefer for this to be implementation specific and then get a JIRA issue complaining that it doesn't behave like in CRuby as several other issues there...
Developers don't read language specs (ECMAScript, etc - does Ruby have an official written spec?) so they consider that code that works is valid code. And they will complain if it doesn't work in another VM that claims to support the same language. So I'm afraid Ruby developers won't ever know that they are not supposed to be use procs (or lambdas) as "refine" blocks unless the interpreter complains about it (like your ArgumentError proposal).
Charles, could you please help us on this subject?
----------------------------------------
Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4085#change-34518
Author: shugo (Shugo Maeda)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category: core
Target version: 2.0.0
=begin
As I said at RubyConf 2010, I'd like to propose a new features called
"Refinements."
Refinements are similar to Classboxes. However, Refinements doesn't
support local rebinding as mentioned later. In this sense,
Refinements might be more similar to selector namespaces, but I'm not
sure because I have never seen any implementation of selector
namespaces.
In Refinements, a Ruby module is used as a namespace (or classbox) for
class extensions. Such class extensions are called refinements. For
example, the following module refines Fixnum.
module MathN
refine Fixnum do
def /(other) quo(other) end
end
end
Module#refine(klass) takes one argument, which is a class to be
extended. Module#refine also takes a block, where additional or
overriding methods of klass can be defined. In this example, MathN
refines Fixnum so that 1 / 2 returns a rational number (1/2) instead
of an integer 0.
This refinement can be enabled by the method using.
class Foo
using MathN
def foo
p 1 / 2
end
end
f = Foo.new
f.foo #=> (1/2)
p 1 / 2
In this example, the refinement in MathN is enabled in the definition
of Foo. The effective scope of the refinement is the innermost class,
module, or method where using is called; however the refinement is not
enabled before the call of using. If there is no such class, module,
or method, then the effective scope is the file where using is called.
Note that refinements are pseudo-lexically scoped. For example,
foo.baz prints not "FooExt#bar" but "Foo#bar" in the following code:
class Foo
def bar
puts "Foo#bar"
end
def baz
bar
end
end
module FooExt
refine Foo do
def bar
puts "FooExt#bar"
end
end
end
module Quux
using FooExt
foo = Foo.new
foo.bar # => FooExt#bar
foo.baz # => Foo#bar
end
Refinements are also enabled in reopened definitions of classes using
refinements and definitions of their subclasses, so they are
*pseudo*-lexically scoped.
class Foo
using MathN
end
class Foo
# MathN is enabled in a reopened definition.
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
class Bar < Foo
# MathN is enabled in a subclass definition.
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
If a module or class is using refinements, they are enabled in
module_eval, class_eval, and instance_eval if the receiver is the
class or module, or an instance of the class.
module A
using MathN
end
class B
using MathN
end
MathN.module_eval do
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
A.module_eval do
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
B.class_eval do
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
B.new.instance_eval do
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
Besides refinements, I'd like to propose new behavior of nested methods.
Currently, the scope of a nested method is not closed in the outer method.
def foo
def bar
puts "bar"
end
bar
end
foo #=> bar
bar #=> bar
In Ruby, there are no functions, but only methods. So there are no
right places where nested methods are defined. However, if
refinements are introduced, a refinement enabled only in the outer
method would be the right place. For example, the above code is
almost equivalent to the following code:
def foo
klass = self.class
m = Module.new {
refine klass do
def bar
puts "bar"
end
end
}
using m
bar
end
foo #=> bar
bar #=> NoMethodError
The attached patch is based on SVN trunk r29837.
=end
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/