[#47790] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Open] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>

32 messages 2012/10/01
[#47791] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator — "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/10/01

[#47792] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2012/10/01

On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:05:17AM +0900, kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI) wrote:

[#47798] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/10/01

(2012/10/02 3:12), Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#47800] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/10/01

(2012/10/02 8:22), SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#47832] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7106][Open] FileUtils.touch should allow touching the symlink itself rather than the file the link points to — "cirrusthinking (Alessandro Diaferia)" <alessandro@...>

18 messages 2012/10/04

[#47847] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7110][Open] CGI: Add support for HTML5 <header> tag — "stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer)" <redmine@...>

16 messages 2012/10/05

[#47870] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7123][Open] Segmentation fault in ruby 1.9.3-p194 — "mscottford (M. Scott Ford)" <scott@...>

13 messages 2012/10/09

[#47880] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7134][Open] Signal handling bug in Mac OS X — "auastro (Andy Kitchen)" <kitchen.andy+rubybug@...>

17 messages 2012/10/10

[#47881] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7135][Open] GC bug in Ruby 1.9.3-p194? — "alexdowad (Alex Dowad)" <alexinbeijing@...>

21 messages 2012/10/10

[#47887] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7137][Open] Date.parse overly lenient when attempting to parse Monday? — "garysweaver (Gary Weaver)" <garysweaver@...>

12 messages 2012/10/10

[#47930] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7148][Open] Improved Tempfile w/o DelegateClass — "Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita)" <glass.saga@...>

14 messages 2012/10/12

[#47970] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7158][Open] require is slow in its bookkeeping; can make Rails startup 2.2x faster — "gregprice (Greg Price)" <price@...>

30 messages 2012/10/14

[#48027] [Backport93 - Backport #7172][Open] [[Ruby 1.9:]] fix rbconfig for --enable-load-relative (v2) — "mpapis (Michal Papis)" <mpapis@...>

13 messages 2012/10/16

[#48053] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7180][Open] set_trace_func with error in proc block locks up Ruby with 100% cpu usage and no way to exit without killing proc — "garysweaver (Gary Weaver)" <garysweaver@...>

8 messages 2012/10/17

[#48072] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7184][Open] --disable-gems commandline parameter does not show up with ruby -h — "steenslag (siep korteling)" <s.korteling@...>

10 messages 2012/10/18

[#48130] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7200][Open] Setting external encoding with BOM| — "brixen (Brian Ford)" <brixen@...>

14 messages 2012/10/21

[#48191] [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

Japanese later; 日本語は後で

37 messages 2012/10/24
[#48696] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/11/01

(2012/10/24 5:39), Yusuke Endoh wrote:

[#48260] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7214][Open] Ruby 2.0 breaks support for some debugging tools — "banister (john mair)" <jrmair@...>

22 messages 2012/10/25

[#48315] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7220][Open] StringIO#initialize_copy causes aliasing between the objects — "brixen (Brian Ford)" <brixen@...>

13 messages 2012/10/26

[#48413] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7221][Open] Unable to compile kgio under 1.9.3 with error: ruby-1.9.3-<plvl>/lib/ruby/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:597:in `Integer': can't convert nil into Integer (TypeError) — "davidderyldowney (David Deryl Downey)" <me@...>

9 messages 2012/10/27

[#48549] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7240][Open] Inheritable #included/#extended Hooks For Modules — "apotonick (Nick Sutterer)" <apotonick@...>

14 messages 2012/10/29

[#48551] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7241][Open] Enumerable#to_h proposal — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>

23 messages 2012/10/29

[#48552] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7242][Open] Bignum mathematical accuracy regression in r31695 — "mhall (Matthew Hall)" <mhall@...>

11 messages 2012/10/29

[ruby-core:48451] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6555][Rejected] New comparison operators

From: "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...>
Date: 2012-10-27 05:02:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #48451
Issue #6555 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).

Status changed from Open to Rejected

I am still in doubt for adding more comparison operators.
We need clear benefit to make a big change like this.

Matz.

----------------------------------------
Feature #6555: New comparison operators
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6555#change-31778

Author: jEFF (Jean-Fran巽ois Berroyer)
Status: Rejected
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category: core
Target version: 2.0.0


=begin
  x <=> y returns -1, 0, 1 or nil
  (x <=> y) == -1 means "x less than y" and is the same as x < y
  (x <=> y) == 0 means "x equal y" is the same as x == y
  (x <=> y) == 1 means "x greater than y" and is the same as x > y
  (x <=> y) == nil means "x not comparable with y" and is the same as !(x <=> y)
We see there is no short syntax to test if two objects are not comparable.
Can we have something like (({x >< y})), provided by (({Comparable})) module, that would mean "x and y are not comparable" ?

As (({x != y})) is a short syntax for (({!(x == y)})), can we have (({x !< y})) for (({!(x < y)})) and (({x !<= y})) for (({!(x <= y)})) and so on ?

As (({x <= y})) is the same as (({(x < y or x == y)})), can we have (({x <> y})) for (({(x < y or x > y)})) ?

Here is a list of all possible comparison operators there could be (and their meanings) :

  < return true when <=> return -1 ("less than")
  == return true when <=> return 0 ("egal")
  > return true when <=> return 1 ("greater than")
  <= return true when <=> return -1 or 0 ("equal or less than")
  >= return true when <=> return 1 or 0 ("equal or greater than")
  <> return true when <=> return 1 or -1 ("less or greater than" that is to say "comparable and different")
  >< return true when <=> return nil ("not comparable")
  !< return true when <=> return 0 or 1 or nil ("not less than", that is different from "greater than or eqal" that involves "comparable")
  != return true when <=> return -1 or 1 or nil ("not equal", that is different from "less or greater than" that involves "comparable")
  !> return true when <=> return -1 or 0 or nil ("not greater than", that is different from "less than or eqal" that involves "comparable")
  !<= return true when <=> return nil or 1 ("not equal nor less than", that is different from "greater than" that involves "comparable")
  !>= return true when <=> return nil or -1 ("not equal nor greater than", that is different from "less than" that involves "comparable")
  !<> return true when <=> return 0 or nil ("not less nor greater than", that is different from "egal" that involves "comparable")
  !>< return true when <=> return -1 or 0 or 1 ("not not comparable" or just "comparable", the same as <=> but returning a boolean)

All these operators would be very useful, especially when working with partial orders (like subset-inclusion for exemple).

Perhaps (({x !== y})) should also be a short syntax for (({!(x === y)})).
=end



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next