[ruby-core:48414] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze

I found that there are 183 not-closed features which are not specified
target version...

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/issues?set_filter=1&f[]=status_id&op[status_id]=o&f[]=tracker_id&op[tracker_id]=%3D&v[tracker_id][]=2&f[]=fixed_version_id&op[fixed_version_id]=!*&f[]=&c[]=tracker&c[]=status&c[]=priority&c[]=subject&c[]=assigned_to&c[]=updated_on&group_by=

I didn't check it.  Please set target version if you strongly believe it
should be introduce into 2.0.

Thanks,
Koichi


(2012/10/27 7:49), SASADA Koichi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I checked all "not closed" features.
> 
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/issues?c[]=tracker&c[]=status&c[]=priority&c[]=subject&c[]=assigned_to&c[]=updated_on&f[]=status_id&f[]=tracker_id&f[]=fixed_version_id&f[]=&group_by=&op[fixed_version_id]=%3D&op[status_id]=o&op[tracker_id]=%3D&page=1&set_filter=1&v[fixed_version_id][]=6&v[tracker_id][]=2
> 
> and I send notice with
> 
> - add comment (ping) on redmine
> - assign to mame-san on redmine the ticket which I can't judge
> - change target to next minor when it seems no discussion on it
> - twitter to people who check twitter frequently
> - skype to nobu
> - IRC to nurse-san
> - mail (akr-san and matz)
> 
> Please correct me if my changes are not correct.
> 
> Note that ~assigned to Matz" is almost equivalent to "ignored".
> I think you need to make pressure to Matz (with good explanation, good
> usecase, etc).
> 
> Thanks,
> Koichi
> 
> 
> (2012/10/24 20:39), Yusuke Endoh wrote:
>> Japanese later; 日本語は後で
>>
>> Hi all --
>>
>> Today, I'd like to declare "feature freeze" according to the schedule [1].
>> 2.0.0 will NOT include any feature that is not accepted yet by matz at
>> this time.
>>
>> [1] http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/40301
>>
>> Sorry for no prior announce of this.  If you, especially committers, have
>> any significant problem, please let me know by next Sunday.
>>
>> In addition, I'm planning to release "feature preview" at the end of the
>> month.  Please tell me your opinion, ASAP.  I've heard that trunk is so
>> stable according to rubyci [2].  Let me know any feature that is already
>> accepted by matz but not implemented yet.
>>
>> [2] http://rubyci.org/
>>
>> We envision the first official release of 2.0 at Feb. 24, 2013, but the
>> concrete plan is not decided yet.  I'll announce it later on.
>> The possible next milestone is "code freeze".  I guess it will be near the
>> end of the year.  Be prepared.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> みなさん、
>>
>> 本日、スケジュール [1] 通りに "feature freeze" を宣言したいと思います。
>> 現時点で matz が承諾してない機能は 2.0.0 には含まれません。
>>
>> [1] http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/40301
>>
>> 事前に連絡できなくてすみません。もし重大な問題があれば (特にコミッタの
>> 方) 、次の日曜日までにご連絡ください。
>>
>> また、月末に "feature preview" をリリースしたいと思っています。意見が
>> あればなるべく早めにください。rubyci [2] によると trunk は結構安定して
>> いると聞いています。matz に承認されてるけど未実装な機能があったら連絡
>> ください。
>>
>> [2] http://rubyci.org/
>>
>> 2013 年 2 月 24 日に 2.0 の公式リリースを目指していますが、具体的な
>> プランは決っていません。後日連絡します。
>> ただし、おそらく次のマイルストーンは "code freeze" です。年末くらいに
>> なると思いますので、その心づもりでいてください。
>>
>> よろしくお願いいたします。
>>
> 
> 


-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net