From: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas Date: 2012-10-24T21:44:22+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:48197] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080203050209070507060507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Em 24-10-2012 09:39, Yusuke Endoh escreveu: > Japanese later; 日本語は後で > > Hi all -- > > Today, I'd like to declare "feature freeze" according to the schedule [1]. > 2.0.0 will NOT include any feature that is not accepted yet by matz at > this time. > > [1] http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/40301 > > Sorry for no prior announce of this. If you, especially committers, have > any significant problem, please let me know by next Sunday. > > In addition, I'm planning to release "feature preview" at the end of the > month. Please tell me your opinion, ASAP. I've heard that trunk is so > stable according to rubyci [2]. Let me know any feature that is already > accepted by matz but not implemented yet. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6265 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4840 If I remember correctly, both were accepted by none has been implemented yet. Is that correct? --------------080203050209070507060507 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Em 24-10-2012 09:39, Yusuke Endoh escreveu:
Japanese later; 日本語は後で

Hi all --

Today, I'd like to declare "feature freeze" according to the schedule [1].
2.0.0 will NOT include any feature that is not accepted yet by matz at
this time.

[1] http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/40301

Sorry for no prior announce of this.  If you, especially committers, have
any significant problem, please let me know by next Sunday.

In addition, I'm planning to release "feature preview" at the end of the
month.  Please tell me your opinion, ASAP.  I've heard that trunk is so
stable according to rubyci [2].  Let me know any feature that is already
accepted by matz but not implemented yet.

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6265
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4840

If I remember correctly, both were accepted by none has been implemented yet. Is that correct?
--------------080203050209070507060507--