[#45426] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6546][Open] Net::HTTP to check for HTTP_PROXY environment setting. — "dekz (Jacob Evans)" <dekzter@...>

14 messages 2012/06/04

[#45431] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6548][Open] Rake doesn't ignore arguments after -- — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>

12 messages 2012/06/05

[#45474] [ANN] Request for "slide-show" of your feature proposal — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

(Japanese later; 日本語が後にあります)

18 messages 2012/06/07

[#45563] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6573][Open] Webrick test failures — "bkabrda (Bohuslav Kabrda)" <bkabrda@...>

19 messages 2012/06/11

[#45567] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6575][Open] Thread#kill sets rb_errinfo() to Fixnum 8 after rb_protect(function, data, &error_tag) — ibc (Iñaki Baz Castillo) <ibc@...>

9 messages 2012/06/11

[#45647] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6592][Open] test_call_double(DL::TestDL) fails on ARM HardFP — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>

15 messages 2012/06/14

[#45657] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6594][Open] Integrated Functor — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>

20 messages 2012/06/15

[#45664] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6596][Open] New method for Arrays : Array#index — "robin850 (Robin Dupret)" <robin.dupret@...>

20 messages 2012/06/15

[#45694] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6602][Open] Tail call optimization: enable by default? — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

12 messages 2012/06/18

[#45715] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6609][Open] Toplevel as self extended module — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>

17 messages 2012/06/19

[#45732] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6614][Open] GC doesn't collect objects bound to (collectable) proc — "rogerdpack (Roger Pack)" <rogerpack2005@...>

9 messages 2012/06/20

[#45733] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6615][Open] Release GVL in zlib when calling inflate() or deflate() — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net>

12 messages 2012/06/21

[#45735] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6616][Open] MinGW: cannot build extensions or run tests due changes in exec_arg? — "luislavena (Luis Lavena)" <luislavena@...>

9 messages 2012/06/21

[#45798] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6634][Open] Deadlock with join and ConditionVariable — "meh. (meh. I don't care)" <meh@...>

20 messages 2012/06/23

[#45805] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6636][Open] Enumerable#size — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

15 messages 2012/06/23

[#45864] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6647][Open] Exceptions raised in threads should be logged — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

71 messages 2012/06/25

[#45902] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6653][Open] 1.9.2/1.9.3 exhibit SEGV with many threads+tcp connections — "erikh (Erik Hollensbe)" <erik@...>

11 messages 2012/06/26

[#45960] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6669][Open] A method like Hash#map but returns hash — "yhara (Yutaka HARA)" <redmine@...>

18 messages 2012/06/29

[#45963] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6670][Open] str.chars.last should be possible — "yhara (Yutaka HARA)" <redmine@...>

36 messages 2012/06/29

[#46021] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6679][Open] Default Ruby source file encoding to utf-8 — "claytrump (Clay Trump)" <clay.trump@...>

21 messages 2012/06/30

[ruby-core:45672] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6596][Feedback] New method for Arrays : Array#index

From: "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...>
Date: 2012-06-16 07:42:23 UTC
List: ruby-core #45672
Issue #6596 has been updated by knu (Akinori MUSHA).

Status changed from Open to Feedback

You haven't shown any real use case yet.
I don't deny that the functionality alone would be a good shortcut itself just like any other proposal we see every day.

But for example, if you just want to use it to delete the matching elements then it will be nothing better than Array#delete.
If I am to replace each element then I'll write a map!.with_index loop, or just use each_with_index in general.

It's all about how you would use it and what the supposed context would look like.
----------------------------------------
Bug #6596: New method for Arrays : Array#index
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6596#change-27272

Author: robin850 (Robin Dupret)
Status: Feedback
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: core
Target version: 2.0.0
ruby -v: 2.0.0


Hello

5 days ago, I submitted a pull request on Github which provides a new method for the array objects which is Array#indexes. I have fist edit the Array#index method in order it to return an array of indexes and not a single index (which is the first occurrence it finds). I found it more logical but a user (trans) tells us that it could break the contract of Array#index so I decided to move it into Array#indexes. Eric (drbrain) tells me I should reasonning why I want to add this method ; it's just a point of view : I don't really understand why Array#index return a single index if the parameter is in the array several times. 

Examples

a = [1, 2, 3, 1]
a.indexes(1)
Return : [0, 3]
a.index(1)
Return : 0
In my opinion, it's not really logical, 1 is in the array twice

Moreover, this pull request doesn't beak anything because we don't edit the Array#index method so programms which were created with previous version of Ruby will work. 

I hope my post is complete. Have a nice day.




-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread