From: Dice <tetradice@...>
Date: 2012-06-03T10:55:18+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:45398] Re: [RFC] RubyVM::FrameInfo.caller method

Hi.

> Other guy pointed out that FrameInfo is to noisy (FooInfo is bad naming
> rule). �At last, we change the class name FrameInfo to Location.
>
>> � � � * vm_backtrace.c: change names.
>> � � � � (1) Class name: RubyVM::FrameInfo -> RubyVM::Backtrace::Location.
>> � � � � (2) Method name: RubyVM::FrameInfo.caller ->
>> � � � � � � Kernel.caller_locations.
>> � � � � (3) Instance methods of
>> � � � � � � � RubyVM::FrameInfo (RubyVM::Backtrace::Location)
>> � � � � � � (3-1) name -> label
>> � � � � � � (3-2) basename -> base_label (basename is confusing with
>> � � � � � � � � � File.basename)
>> � � � � � � (3-3) line_no -> lineno (We have already similar name
>> � � � � � � � � � File#lineno, commented by kou [ruby-dev:45686]).
>> � � � � � � (3-4) filename -> path.
>> � � � � � � (3-5) filepath -> absolute_path.
>> � � � � � � (3-5) iseq -> removed (we will make other APIs to access iseq
>> � � � � � � � � � and other information of frame for debugging).
>
> What do you think about it?

I think it's better naming and design than RubyVM::FrameInfo too. It
is friendly.

Thank you for replying!

--
Dice
tetradice@gmail.com
http://ruby.morphball.net/