[#37730] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4962][Open] come back gem_prelude! — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

24 messages 2011/07/02

[#37840] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4985][Open] Add %S[] support for making a list of symbols — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

23 messages 2011/07/07

[#37866] [Backport87 - Feature #4996][Open] About 1.8.7 EOL — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>

22 messages 2011/07/08

[#37913] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5003][Open] Enumerator#next segfaults in OS X Lion (10.7) — Ganesh Gunasegaran <ganesh.gunas@...>

16 messages 2011/07/09

[#37917] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5005][Open] Provide convenient access to original methods — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

13 messages 2011/07/09

[#37932] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5008][Open] Equal rights for Hash (like Array, String, Integer, Float) — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>

31 messages 2011/07/09

[#37936] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5010][Open] Add Slop(-like) in stdlib and deprecate current OptionParser API — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

29 messages 2011/07/09

[#37968] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5015][Open] method_added" is called in addition to "method_undefined — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

14 messages 2011/07/10

[#38096] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5033][Open] PATCH: 1.9: gc_mark_children: Avoid gc_mark() tail recursion, use goto again. — Kurt Stephens <ks.ruby@...>

14 messages 2011/07/16

[#38109] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5034][Open] C Source Code formatting — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

18 messages 2011/07/16

[#38171] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5047][Open] Segfault (most likely involving require) — Jack Christensen <jack@...>

21 messages 2011/07/18

[#38182] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5054][Open] Compress a sequence of ends — ANDO Yasushi ANDO <andyjpn@...>

68 messages 2011/07/19

[#38197] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056][Open] About 1.9 EOL — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>

39 messages 2011/07/19
[#38900] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/08/10

[#38902] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/08/10

Hi,

[#39048] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/08/22

Hi,

[#39055] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...> 2011/08/23

On 23/08/11 at 06:50 +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#38295] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5064][Open] HTTP user-agent class — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

15 messages 2011/07/21

[#38391] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5076][Open] Mac OS X Lion Support — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>

17 messages 2011/07/22

[#38503] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5096][Open] offer Logger-compatibility for ext — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

16 messages 2011/07/25

[#38510] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5097][Assigned] Supported platforms of Ruby 1.9.3 — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>

42 messages 2011/07/26

[#38526] [Backport92 - Backport #5099][Open] Backport r31875 load path performance problem — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

19 messages 2011/07/26

[#38538] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5101][Open] allow optional timeout for TCPSocket.new — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

15 messages 2011/07/27

[#38610] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5120][Open] String#split needs to be logical — Alexey Muranov <muranov@...>

18 messages 2011/07/30

[#38623] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5123][Open] Alias Hash 1.9 as OrderedHash — Alexey Muranov <muranov@...>

14 messages 2011/07/31

[ruby-core:37958] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #2008] test_io.rb: test 2 fails on FreeBSD

From: Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Date: 2011-07-10 06:29:06 UTC
List: ruby-core #37958
Issue #2008 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.


At least, current trunk + FreeBSD 8.2 don't reproduce this issue.

----------------------------------------
Bug #2008: test_io.rb: test 2 fails on FreeBSD
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/2008

Author: Lucas Nussbaum
Status: Feedback
Priority: Low
Assignee: Akira Tanaka
Category: core
Target version: 1.9.3
ruby -v: 1.9.1.243


=begin
 Hi,
 
 Test 2 in test_io.rb fails on FreeBSD. This is related to http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1066, which, according to the comments posted after the bug was closed, wasn't really fixed.
 
 I ran into this on Debian GNU/kfreebsd (Debian userland, freebsd kernel). One of our freebsd porter wrote (see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543805):
 
 > The test assumes that the kernel buffer for pipes have fixed size.
 > It does not have to be true, there could be adaptive buffer size
 > provided by kernel. After filling whole kernel buffer (by non-blocking 
 > write), it might be required to buffer becomes filled only from half
 > or even empty. The next write() might be blocked until whole 
 > kernel buffer is read. Such behaviour of kernel is correct one.
 > 
 > The kernel of FreeBSD uses adaptive pipe sizes and direct pipe writes,
 > see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c
 
 (It is likely to be the same on Mac OS X)
 
 He suggests changing the test to:
 >   begin
 >     require "io/nonblock"
 >     r, w = IO.pipe
 >     w.nonblock = true
 >     bytes = w.write_nonblock("a" * 100000)
 >     w.nonblock = false
 >     t1 = Thread.new { w.write("b" * 4096) }
 >     t2 = Thread.new { w.write("c" * 4096) }
 >     sleep 0.5
 >     blocks = 2 + bytes/4096
 >     blocks.times {
 >          r.sysread(4096).length
 >          sleep 0.1
 >     }
 >     t1.join
 >     t2.join
 >   rescue LoadError
 >   end
 
 However, I don't understand what that test is trying to test. It might be better to simply remove that test...
=end



-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next