[#29270] Proposal: Module#thunk_method — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>

Many people use define_method solely so they can define a new method

13 messages 2010/04/06

[#29293] URI.(un)escape deprecated? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

Hi.

16 messages 2010/04/07
[#29366] Re: URI.(un)escape deprecated? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/04/08

2010/4/7 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:

[#29313] [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Bug #3112: require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default

28 messages 2010/04/08
[#29315] [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #3112 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29336] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/04/08

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:06:55PM +0900, Yui NARUSE wrote:

[#29395] [Bug #3119] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Simon Nicholls <redmine@...>

Bug #3119: [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage

9 messages 2010/04/09

[#29427] [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3124: SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all)

10 messages 2010/04/11

[#29462] [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #3131: add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array()

10 messages 2010/04/11

[#29464] [Bug #3132] …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error — Ashley Williams <redmine@...>

Bug #3132: …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error

8 messages 2010/04/12

[#29486] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3140: gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9

102 messages 2010/04/13
[#31002] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/07/02

Issue #3140 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#31003] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/02

Hi,

[#31005] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2010/07/02

We are about to ship a version of Ruby with a built in package manager with

[#29489] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/04/13

After a brief discussion with Eric Hodel about this, there are a few questions before we can figure out how to solve this:

[#29513] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/04/14

Is there any comment on this? This is a big bug in 1.9.2 that we'd like to get fixed as soon as we can, but I need some input on it.

[#29526] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Rich Kilmer <rich.kilmer@...> 2010/04/15

I wrote this original code in gem_prelude.

[#31104] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/07/07

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#31108] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/07

> I've commited the patch to trunk.

[#31193] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/11

Hi,

[#31223] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/12

> Roger, could you re-try to build from scratch? ould you apply

[#31215] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yehuda Katz <redmine@...> 2010/07/12

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yehuda Katz.

[#31218] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/07/12

Hi,

[#29528] [Bug #3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #3150: net/https peer verification doesn't do anything

11 messages 2010/04/15

[#29578] [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Bug #3163: SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument

17 messages 2010/04/17
[#29583] [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/04/18

Issue #3163 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#29641] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...>

Feature #3176: Thread#priority= should actually do something

28 messages 2010/04/19

[#29710] [Bug #3185] File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — Brian Ford <redmine@...>

Bug #3185: File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path

10 messages 2010/04/21

[#29835] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...>

Bug #3212: ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads

24 messages 2010/04/28

[#29868] [Bug:trunk] assert now passes non-boolean result — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2010/04/29

[ruby-core:29702] [Bug #1341] pthread_cond_timedwait failing in 1.9.1-p0 thread tests

From: Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-04-21 17:31:35 UTC
List: ruby-core #29702
Issue #1341 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

Assigned to set to Yusuke Endoh

Hi,

I guess this is the limitation of Solaris:

- http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4038480
- http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/806-0630/6j9vkb8ct?a=view

  EINVAL
    ...
    For cond_timedwait(), the specified number of seconds, abstime,
    is greater than current_time + 100,000,000, where current_time
    is the current time, or the number of nanoseconds is greater
    than or equal to 1,000,000,000.

Maybe, HP-UX has the same limitation, though I cannot find the
evidence.

I wrote a workaround patch:

diff --git a/thread_pthread.c b/thread_pthread.c
index e6295db..7387724 100644
--- a/thread_pthread.c
+++ b/thread_pthread.c
@@ -633,6 +633,35 @@ native_sleep(rb_thread_t *th, struct timeval *tv)
 			     (unsigned long)ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec);
 		r = pthread_cond_timedwait(&th->native_thread_data.sleep_cond,
 					   &th->interrupt_lock, &ts);
+		if (r == EINVAL) {
+		    /* workaround for Solaris: wait by MEGA_SEC's.
+		     * on Solaris, pthread_cond_timedwait fails with EINVAL
+		     * if time is too far from now.  [Bug #1341]
+		     * - http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/806-0630/6j9vkb8ct?a=view
+		     * - http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4038480
+		     */
+#define MEGA_SEC 1000000
+		    struct timeval ltv = *tv;
+		    r = ETIMEDOUT;
+		    while (r == ETIMEDOUT && ltv.tv_sec > MEGA_SEC) {
+			ts.tv_sec = tvn.tv_sec + MEGA_SEC;
+			ts.tv_nsec = tvn.tv_usec * 1000;
+			ltv.tv_sec -= MEGA_SEC;
+			r = pthread_cond_timedwait(&th->native_thread_data.sleep_cond,
+						   &th->interrupt_lock, &ts);
+			if (r && r != ETIMEDOUT) rb_bug_errno("pthread_cond_timedwait", r);
+		    }
+		    if (r == ETIMEDOUT) {
+			ts.tv_sec = tvn.tv_sec + ltv.tv_sec;
+			ts.tv_nsec = (tvn.tv_usec + ltv.tv_usec) * 1000;
+			if (ts.tv_nsec >= PER_NANO){
+	    		    ts.tv_sec += 1;
+	    		    ts.tv_nsec -= PER_NANO;
+			}
+			r = pthread_cond_timedwait(&th->native_thread_data.sleep_cond,
+						   &th->interrupt_lock, &ts);
+		    }
+		}
 		if (r && r != ETIMEDOUT) rb_bug_errno("pthread_cond_timedwait", r);
 
 		thread_debug("native_sleep: pthread_cond_timedwait end (%d)\n", r);

-- 
Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1341

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread