[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:27167] Re: [Bug #2394] [BUG] pthread_mutex_lock: 22 revisited

From: Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Date: 2009-12-14 17:05:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #27167
> r26061 fixes a bug related this.
> Does this still happen?

I had hoped so, too.

Here's the current.

~$ cat test_fork.rb
require 'forkoff'
a = File.open('out', 'w')
[1].forkoff { |n|
  a.write n
}
a.close

~$ ~/installs/ruby_trunk_installed/bin/ruby -v test_fork.rb
ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-12-14 trunk 26099) [i686-linux]
[BUG] pthread_mutex_lock: Invalid argument (EINVAL)
ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-12-14 trunk 26099) [i686-linux]

-- control frame ----------
---------------------------

-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_vm_bugreport+0x72)
[0xb7eb7482]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9 [0xb7d876b1]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_bug+0x3a)
[0xb7d8776a]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_bug_errno+0x7f5)
[0xb7d884f5]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_thread_blocking_region+0x1fa)
[0xb7ebe0ea]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9 [0xb7daceda]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9 [0xb7daf3fe]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_io_fptr_finalize+0xe4)
[0xb7daf614]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9 [0xb7d9d886]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9 [0xb7d9e772]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9(ruby_cleanup+0x12e)
[0xb7d8d0ce]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9 [0xb7ebdd96]
/home/rdp/installs/ruby_trunk_installed//lib/libruby.so.1.9 [0xb7ebde31]
/lib/libpthread.so.0 [0xb7d13fc0]
/lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e) [0xb7c32a1e]

[NOTE]
You may have encountered a bug in the Ruby interpreter or extension libraries.
Bug reports are welcome.
For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html

Thanks!
-r

In This Thread