From: SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Date: 2009-06-12T08:28:53+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:23812] Re: [Bug #977] caller for all threads patch

Roger Pack wrote::
>> Roger Pack wrote::
>>> I really like it.
>>> Appears that it wants default to be level 0 [?]
>> Thank you for your notice.
>>
>> I've change my thought.  Thread#backtrace() is more proffered name.
>>
>> - On Thread#caller(lev), nobody may use lev (!= 0)
>> - Deciding the semantics of lev except zero may be difficult
> 
> That sounds better.  Then the semantics for caller never change.  So
> this would be Thread#backtrace can have lev > 0?
> Either way's good for me.

No.  Same as Exception#backtrace.

How about it, matz?

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net