From: Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Date: 2009-06-10T22:31:45+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:23787] Re: [Bug #977] caller for all threads patch

> Roger Pack wrote::
>> I really like it.
>> Appears that it wants default to be level 0 [?]
>
> Thank you for your notice.
>
> I've change my thought. �Thread#backtrace() is more proffered name.
>
> - On Thread#caller(lev), nobody may use lev (!= 0)
> - Deciding the semantics of lev except zero may be difficult

That sounds better.  Then the semantics for caller never change.  So
this would be Thread#backtrace can have lev > 0?
Either way's good for me.
-=r