[#21039] Happy new year and... moving Ruby development to Git? — Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...>
Happy new year everyone.
On Jan 1, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Michael Klishin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 11:22 AM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
brabuhr@gmail.com writes:
Quoting Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@gmail.com>:
Hi,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Florian Gilcher <flo@andersground.net> wrote:
My opinion:
My two cents:
Eust痃uio Rangel wrote:
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 21:40, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:39 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:14, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu>wrote:
Michael Klishin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Michael Klishin
On 05.01.2009, at 16:10, RadosナＢw BuナＢt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:22:49PM +0900, Michael Klishin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Florian Gilcher <flo@andersground.net>wrote:
On Jan 1, 2009, at 04:42 AM, Michael Klishin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 00:34, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Jan 2, 2009, at 17:25 PM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> I think I'm entitled to an opinion on the subject because I am a
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Brent Roman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 04:03:12AM +0900, James Gray wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Michael Klishin
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:48:09PM +0900, Michael Klishin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Florian Gilcher <flo@andersground.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Florian Gilcher <flo@andersground.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#21094] [Bug #975] ruby curses extension does not support multibyte characters — Michal Suchanek <redmine@...>
Bug #975: ruby curses extension does not support multibyte characters
[#21097] [Bug #977] caller for all threads patch — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #977: caller for all threads patch
I made a patch to Thread#caller(lev=1). It may be more flexible than
One thing I think might be cool is rather than raising an error for a
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:06 PM, SASADA Koichi<ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#21180] how to use git to work with MBARI patches — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>
At 3:16 AM +0900 1/7/09, Brent Roman asked in a previous thread about git:
[#21181] ruby_version changes in 1.9.1-rc1 — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
Hello All,
[#21238] [Bug #996] IRB doesn't work anymore with ruby-1.9.1-rc1 on MinGW — Chauk-Mean PROUM <redmine@...>
Bug #996: IRB doesn't work anymore with ruby-1.9.1-rc1 on MinGW
[#21244] [Bug #999] SSL & ZIP missing from ruby-1.9.1-preview1-i386-mswin32 — William Mason <redmine@...>
Bug #999: SSL & ZIP missing from ruby-1.9.1-preview1-i386-mswin32
Issue #999 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#21259] Do I need a special build arg to get irb to accept utf characters on OSX — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'm seeing very strange behavior at the irb prompt with ruby 1.9.1
On 1/11/09 1:06 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#21269] [Bug #1005] Strange behaviour of File.directory? under Windows — Alex Fortuna <redmine@...>
Bug #1005: Strange behaviour of File.directory? under Windows
[#21289] MRI 1.8.6 bug - exit is ignored if ensure clause throws exception which is caught by outer rescue — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>
The following code snippet does print "after foo" when using MRI 1.8.6 on Windows Vista, showing that exit is ignored. Any thoughts on whether this is by design, a known bug, or a new issue? If it's the latter, should I open a bug for it?
[#21302] [PATCH] drastically improve rb_waitpid for short-lived children — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
This evening I wrote this patch while helping a friend diagnose why,
[#21309] Current status of 1.9.1 RC2 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#21315] Proc-as-Binding is out again? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
1.8 can use a proc as a binding:
It seems to be more interface based rather than disallowing the access
[#21339] [Bug #1010] Ruby-1.9's rake sh doesn't work on Windows (but fix provided) — Chauk-Mean Proum <redmine@...>
Bug #1010: Ruby-1.9's rake sh doesn't work on Windows (but fix provided)
Issue #1010 has been updated by Chauk-Mean Proum.
[#21345] [Bug #1011] Chinese GB18030 transcoding is breaking build at r21509 — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #1011: Chinese GB18030 transcoding is breaking build at r21509
[#21383] [Bug #1019] irb/xmp fails because StringInputMethod doesn't support #encoding — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>
Bug #1019: irb/xmp fails because StringInputMethod doesn't support #encoding
[#21399] Proposal: Module#copy_method — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
I'd like it to be possible to copy methods from one module to another. The
2009/1/18 Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>:
Excerpts from Pit Capitain's message of Sun Jan 18 11:23:48 +0200 2009:
Yehuda Katz wrote:
AOP requires being able to hook into method dispatch, which either requires
Yehuda Katz wrote:
So I guess the question is... what's wrong with the implementation ;)
Yehuda Katz wrote:
Just FYI, the define_method version fails if your method requires the use of
I believe that methods (and blocks defined as methods via method_defined) are somehow closed over the module that declares them so that "super" can find the right module/class whose parent's method to call. At least they are in IronRuby :)
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
For my use-case, it would be ok to support copying methods to ANY module,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:15, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
[#21444] ruby 1.9 hashes, etc. — "Roger Pack" <rogerdpack@...>
I noticed in the NEWS file that 1.9 has more compacted hashes--does it then
[#21448] [PATCH] Allow building ruby with mingw — Alexey Borzenkov <snaury@...>
---
[#21454] [Feature #1027] Dir.home — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>
Feature #1027: Dir.home
Hi,
Excerpts from Nobuyoshi Nakada's message of Wed Jan 21 05:19:23 +0200 2009:
[#21458] Repost: Evaluation order of block pass versus arguments — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
I posted this nearly a year ago and never got any replies. I'm reposting
[#21460] Array concat loops sometimes taking large amounts of "system" time. — Ron Mayer <rm_rails@...>
On both ruby1.8 and ruby1.9, about half the time when I run loops like this:
[#21473] Time.gm give me ArgumentError out of range (ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [i486-linux]) — Claudio Fiorini <claudio@...>
Hi all,
[#21492] 2 small warning fixes for 1.9.1 — Marcus Rueckert <darix@...>
hi,
[#21495] [Bug #1033] wrong documentation for Kernel#catch — Patrik Wenger <redmine@...>
Bug #1033: wrong documentation for Kernel#catch
[#21550] [Feature #1046] request: ability to run without specifying .rb — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Feature #1046: request: ability to run without specifying .rb
Issue #1046 has been updated by Roger Pack.
Hi,
>
Hi,
> |Oh sorry--I meant that you would probably find my answer [that I am lazy and
[#21552] [Feature #1047] request: getters, setters for the GC — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Feature #1047: request: getters, setters for the GC
I agree that something in this direction should be done.
Issue #1047 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#21570] [Bug #1057] ripper does not compile with mingw — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>
Bug #1057: ripper does not compile with mingw
[#21598] [Bug #1060] mkmf refuses to find 3rd party extensions - ruby 1.9.1 trunk — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>
Bug #1060: mkmf refuses to find 3rd party extensions - ruby 1.9.1 trunk
[#21613] [Bug #1063] in `write': Not enough space - <STDOUT> (Errno::ENOMEM) on Windows XP — Nick Gorbikoff <redmine@...>
Bug #1063: in `write': Not enough space - <STDOUT> (Errno::ENOMEM) on Windows XP
Issue #1063 has been updated by Tinco Andringa.
[#21618] UID Too Big, A Bug? — James Gray <james@...>
Is this a bug in Ruby?
[#21640] [Bug #1068] Ruby Cannot Handle Some UIDs — James Gray <redmine@...>
Bug #1068: Ruby Cannot Handle Some UIDs
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 05:00:05PM +0100, James Gray wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 08:53:38AM +0100, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Ondrej Bilka wrote:
On Jan 29, 2009, at 3:43 AM, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:33 AM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>wrote:
On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:04 AM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>wrote:
One small edit I'm sorry I can resist since after all this *is* a
[#21701] [Feature #1081] add File::write() convenience method — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>
Feature #1081: add File::write() convenience method
Issue #1081 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
Hi,
Hi,
Is it intended that the length of the leading nulls are not included
Hi,
>> Is it intended that the length of the leading nulls are not included
Hi,
Teamwork. :-)
2010/3/6 Run Paint Run Run <runrun@runpaint.org>:
[#21702] [Feature #1082] add Object#singleton_class method — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>
Feature #1082: add Object#singleton_class method
Issue #1082 has been updated by Suraj Kurapati.
Hi,
> We haven't met any consensus of a name for the method.
+1 for Eigenclass
+1 for metaclass, as is it compatible with ActiveSupport, Rubinius and _why. Also, it confuses people with a Python background.
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 23.02.10 08:14, Shugo Maeda wrote:
Hi,
Issue #1082 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
Hi,
[ruby-core:21158] Re: Happy new year and... moving Ruby development to Git?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Florian Gilcher > <flo@andersground.net> wrote: >> Darcs still has no concept of branches. I quite like that. It gives >> a better >> overview on your file system. Every "branch" is still laid out like >> you >> would have it in SVN or something like that. > > Although I've never used darcs, the inability to properly handle > branches was actually one of the reasons why I gladly moved away from > mercurial (my first dscm). > > The upside of git is that it doesn't _force_ you to work with separate > checkouts for separate branches, although you _can_ do it: just clone > the local repo --git is even smart enough to hardlink blobs when > possible. I say this is a strong vote in favour of git, as it allows > both branching workflows (in-place and separate checkout). I'm on the "i don't want to think to much about it" or "lazy bastard" side. For example, one of my main reasons for darcs is it's nice cherry-picking interface that is the _default_ way of handling it. Sure, i could use git cherry-pick and friends, but Darcs gives me the collection of features I really like at my fingertips. Also, I tend not to play with branches too much, but only push the patches I really want back to upstream/trunk. Thats the default way in darcs. Sure, I could push git into my workflow, but that would mean I would have to costumize git everytime I change computers. It does a lot, but i only need half of it and it always takes me time to figure out which half I wanted to use. Also, if you allow both workflows, which link will you put on your website? ;) As I said before: your mileage may vary. I don't like git that much and I also have a problem with hypes. So I would tend to wait until the "revolution" is over. But I support the democratic process ;). Regards, Florian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkliRyQACgkQyLKU2FMxSOJzcwCgh9c5WlHX8LOcImLFpBRMY3qD qVkAnjX/3PbnABGSog7IaZnjC37TvXef =dhTY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----