From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2003-12-02T14:36:47+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby2 RCR (was Re: Constants, class variables and the cbase field) Hi, In message "Re: Ruby2 RCR (was Re: Constants, class variables and the cbase field)" on 03/12/02, "T. Onoma" writes: |The particular RCR I was refering to is the 'Resume RCR'. You rejected, but it |is listed in Ruby source TODO file: | | * resumable Exception via Exception#resume | |I discovered this a week or so after I made my RCR for same idea. So it is |confusing to me that you would reject something that is already planned to |do. Even if you changed your mind, wouldn't you say something about that? I |don't know. I just think maybe it is another good reason to have better tools |for the process of suggestion -> proposal -> RCR. Or something like that. |That way you only need to deal with RCRs. The rest of us will deal with the |the others. I put that in the ToDo file, just because CommonLisp has that particular feature, but haven't had time to consider it deep. Your proposal made me think about it a bit, and I concluded it's not really a right tool for your case, and found some obstacles to merge it in the Ruby. matz.