From: Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date: 2008-04-21T16:17:14+09:00
Subject: Re: revision number in ruby -v (1.9)

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: revision number in ruby -v (1.9)"
>     on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:52:55 +0900, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> writes:
> 
> |Why does `svn info` say 16110, but `ruby -v` says 15824?
> 
> Perhaps the latest revision does not belong to trunk.

Ok. Makes sense. What's puzzling me is that when I updated 1.9 recently, 
the reported revision didn't change, even though it seemed like a lot of 
files got updated and built.

Before:

$ ruby19svn -v
ruby 1.9.0 (2008-03-21 revision 15824) [i686-linux]

After:

$ ruby19svn -v
ruby 1.9.0 (2008-04-20 revision 15824) [i686-linux]

So, is the date more important than svn revision for determining what 
interpreter version is running?

-- 
       vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407