From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2008-04-05T09:50:04+09:00
Subject: Re: RUBY_IMPLEMENTATION


On Apr 4, 2008, at 15:53 , Meinrad Recheis wrote:
> Don't use IMPL instead of IMPLEMENTATION.
> Such a constant would definitely not be used as frequently as def or
> attr_accessor ... so there is absolutely nothing wrong with it being
> long.
>
> (impl can also be read as implication, implantation, implausible or
> implosion even if computer engineers will most likely not read it as
> such)

bikeshed.

I trust matz to come up with something acceptable. Don't you?