From: Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@...>
Date: 2008-04-04T01:07:52+09:00
Subject: Re: issue tracking (Re: [ANN] RCRchive shutting down)

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
>
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org]
>  > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 5:14 AM
>  > To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
>  > Subject: issue tracking (Re: [ANN] RCRchive shutting down)
>  >
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > In message "Re: [ANN] RCRchive shutting down"
>  >     on Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:07:07 +0900, "Robert Dober"
>  > <robert.dober@gmail.com> writes:
>  >
>  > |>  We are going to setup development issue tracking system,
>  > which will,
>  > |> I hope, gradually provide features you described.
>  >
>  > |That is good news :)
>  >
>  > Probably we are going to use RedMine (with some
>  > modification), but does any one of you have any other
>  > suggestion?  Restrospectiva? Lighthouse?
>  >
>  >                                                       matz.
>
>  I've tried many - RubyForge, SourceForge, Savannah, Google's thingy, RT,
>  Jira, Lighthouse, Trac. I haven't tried Open Collab, though.
>
>  Redmine is better than any of the ones I've tried. And, beyond being
>  "politically correct", using a tool written in Ruby means users can
>  easily submit patches to the tool itself.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Dan
>
>
>  This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
>  privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly
>  prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication
>  in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
>  all copies of the communication and any attachments.
>
>

I second the "no" on Trac. While it is quite a useful tool, I'll be
giving others a try from here on out, especially RedMine.

Jason