From: Chad Fowler <chad@...>
Date: 2003-09-05T10:05:37+09:00
Subject: Re: New tests

On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Dave Thomas wrote:

# I was looking through the new test/ruby/* stuff just now, and notices 
# that the code did
# 
#    assert( 1+2 == 3)
# 
# rather than
# 
#    assert_equal(3, 1+2)
# 
# In general, wouldn't it be better to do the latter, so that we get 
# meaningful error messages?
# 
# 

I would agree (and I think Nathaniel would as well)....

Does this supercede Rubicon?

Thanks,
Chad