From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-09-04T00:07:51+09:00
Subject: Re: [BUG] Additional info regarding ruby-talk:66239

Hi,

In message "Re: [BUG] Additional info regarding ruby-talk:66239"
    on 03/09/03, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

| Now rb_gc_mark_frame(frame) will mark frame->argv, but if frame->argv is
| also in the copied stack, ruby must mark ADJ(frame->argv) rather than
| frame->argv, no ?

Indeed.  Thank you for pointing out.

							matz.