From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
Date: 2003-08-13T09:09:29+09:00
Subject: Re: proc/block with return


On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> In message "Re: proc/block with return"
>     on 03/08/12, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@sympatico.ca> writes:
> |irb(main):001:0> def f(&b) b.call; end; def g; f{return 42}+1; end; g
> |=> 43
> |irb(main):002:0> def f; yield; end; def g; f{return 42}+1; end; g
> |=> 42
> |Normally I'd call this a bug, but it seems to be intentional,
> Hmm, I too feel smell of a bug.  Let me consider.

One first mistake of mine was to assume I recalled how Ruby works wrt
this.

One second mistake was to assume "next" is a valid replacement for that,
but it's only often so, because it really has to do with "while" and not
"yield" nor Proc#call.

Now I wouldn't know how that should be fixed.

________________________________________________________________
Mathieu Bouchard                       http://artengine.ca/matju