From: "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
Date: 2007-10-22T14:00:24+09:00
Subject: Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I happened to notice this...

Eric Hodel wrote:
> On IRC last night, matz, Koichi, akr and myself decided that RubyGems
> would be imported into trunk, but without require 'rubygems' by
> default.  (Correct me if I am wrong.)
> 
> We didn't make a plan for when/how this would happen.

You 4 decided that RubyGesm would be imported into trunk without require
'rubygems' by default.

Does this mean you're planning to add the LoadError fallback something
like akr is proposing?  Or you're planning to let users use RUBYOPT as
you wrote in [ruby-core:11818] ?

[ruby-core:11818]
| Not everybody will need RubyGems.  For example many Rails
| installations run with everything unpacked into a local directory for
| easy deployment.
|
| I would prefer users use RUBYOPT instead of enabling RubyGems by
| default.

Regards,
// NaHi

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)

iQEVAwUBRxwuSR9L2jg5EEGlAQI4DQf8DD0SDq8fdbeaDWs/6Cap5UJvh4ZeXW6d
zjnqHwefDVDEUeJL4OAhHZfvuh1f5bB1gokMSMchtlJtrZI4iO+8O0w8Wv5J4KeY
iUZBx+unBVtnFNckKV+EZpiYH0djN9bfFax9xEBGPUZYAtwNue0ssEQ4XdgRAZhZ
Xe7BmLJUV2Pimh1mSH688Wx6Jm4zEUVBu8oqkJyzQi6TCNgsbnmBMAgm55FDx4Zn
nZ1RwSkkbuxuV3MApG4mwCymns6wOpulrIe6WGf8INUyZ/y8f3W97tfo4JPyHSFA
QZ6lICsA6+7z9FYtjkWJxcWEG6z0SGf8R6zt0kQ6ke5iGd49MB+AZg==
=umt0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----