From: Richard Zidlicky <rz@...68k.org>
Date: 2003-07-22T19:08:13+09:00
Subject: Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:59:19PM +0900, ts wrote:
> >>>>> "R" == Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> 
> R>   Hash.new begin 12 end
> 
>      Hash.new do 12 end
> 
> R> it is rather irritating if the block is plainly ignored.
> 
>  This is what the documentation is for.

After suffering a few problems like that where the documentation
was less than perfect I see it differently.
Is there any techincal reason why it would be unreasonable to
raise an error in this situation?
Weak typed languages are fine but this looks more like 
a blunt problem with the implementation.

Richard