From: ts Date: 2003-07-21T21:59:19+09:00 Subject: Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block >>>>> "R" == Richard Zidlicky writes: R> Hash.new begin 12 end Hash.new do 12 end R> it is rather irritating if the block is plainly ignored. This is what the documentation is for. R> Perhaps it would be possible to use a convention to append eg "&" R> to all method names that expect a block? Well, I've the strange impression that this is just because you see for the first time a language with block, like ruby, that you need some artificials way to know when a method use a block, or not. Just let the beginner learn the language and after he'll not have problems and don't need some artificials convention. Guy Decoux