From: "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2025-02-07T20:47:57+00:00
Subject: [ruby-core:120910] [Ruby master Feature#21121] Ractor channels

Issue #21121 has been updated by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).


I think adding a channel object would be very helpful.  I'm looking through shared data structures in Rails, trying to understand what we need to change for Ractor safety.  One popular data structure is a Concurrent::Map, and there are various instances used as caches.  In order to implement a similar data structure with Ractors I end up writing my own channel:

```ruby
class Ractor::Channel
  def self.new
    Ractor.new do
      loop do
        Ractor.yield Ractor.receive
      end
    end
  end
end

class Map
  def initialize
    @r = Ractor.new {
      cache = { "int" => "integer", "bool" => "boolean" }
      loop do
        channel, key = Ractor.receive

        val = cache[key] ||= "not found #{key}"

        # Send back to requester
        channel.send val
      end
    }

    freeze
  end

  def [] key
    c = Ractor::Channel.new
    @r.send([c, key])
    c.take
  end
end

map = Map.new
p map["int"]
```

I would really like it if channels were built-in.

----------------------------------------
Feature #21121: Ractor channels
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21121#change-111791

* Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber)
* Status: Open
----------------------------------------
# Motivation:

It would be nice be able to `Ractor.yield` in a non-blocking way. Right now a `Ractor.yield` blocks until another ractor calls `r.take` on the yielding ractor.
This is bad in the following scenario:

```ruby
main = Ractor.current

rs = 10.times.map do
  Ractor.new(main) do |m|
    ret = []
    loop do
      # do a bunch of work that takes a while, then:
      begin
        obj = m.take
      rescue Ractor::ClosedError
      end
      if obj
        ret << obj
      else
        break
      end
    end
    ret
  end
end

50.times do |i|
  Ractor.yield(i) # this will block until some ractor calls take on us, but it could be a while if there is processing before the `take` call.
end
main.close_outgoing

# Ideally, we could do some work in main ractor that takes some time while the other ractors do their processing. But we're blocking right now
# during all the calls to `Ractor.yield`.

# Finally, get the results
while rs.any?
  r, obj = Ractor.select(*rs)
  $stderr.puts "Ractor #{r} got #{obj}"
  rs.delete(r)
end
```

I'd like other ractors to be able to do work in a "fire and forget" kind of way. It isn't possible right now due to the limitations of `Ractor.yield` and `Ractor#take`.
What we need is some kind of `yield` buffer so the yielder doesn't block. I propose that Ractor channels would allow this type of programming to work.

## Example using channels:


```ruby
chan = Ractor::Channel.new # We could specify buffer size like Go or it could be dynamically growable

rs = 10.times.map do
  Ractor.new(chan) do |c|
    ret = []
    loop do
      obj, _closed = c.receive # returns `[nil, true]` if `c` is closed and its buffer is empty. It blocks if the buffer is empty and `c` is not closed.
      if obj
        ret << obj
      else
        break
      end
    end
    ret
  end
end

50.times do |i|
  chan.send(i) # non-blocking, fills a buffer and only wakes a receiver if there is one
end
chan.close

# Do some processing while ractors do their work.

# Then, collect the results
while rs.any?
  r, obj = Ractor.select(*rs)
  puts "Ractor #{r} got #{obj}"
  rs.delete(r)
end
```

With an API similar to this, we could have "fire and forget" processing with ractors.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/