[#119390] [Ruby master Feature#20775] Gemify win32-registry, win32-sspi and win32-resolv — "larskanis (Lars Kanis) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20775 has been reported by larskanis (Lars Kanis).

12 messages 2024/10/01

[#119410] [Ruby master Feature#20778] ruby/repl_type_completor as a bundled gem — "tompng (tomoya ishida) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIwNzc4IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHRvbXBuZyAodG9tb3lhIGlzaGlkYSku

7 messages 2024/10/02

[#119432] [Ruby master Misc#20781] DevMeeting-2024-11-07 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20781 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

11 messages 2024/10/03

[#119442] [Ruby master Feature#20782] Introduction of Happy Eyeballs Version 2 (RFC8305) in TCPSocket.new — "shioimm (Misaki Shioi) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIwNzgyIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHNoaW9pbW0gKE1pc2FraSBTaGlvaSku

12 messages 2024/10/04

[#119462] [Ruby master Bug#20785] Should `a in b, and c` `a in b, or c` `a in b, rescue c` be syntax ok? — "tompng (tomoya ishida) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20785 has been reported by tompng (tomoya ishida).

10 messages 2024/10/05

[#119495] [Ruby master Feature#20792] String#forcible_encoding? — "kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20792 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton).

16 messages 2024/10/09

[#119514] [Ruby master Bug#20796] Segmentation fault in rubyzip tests with ruby 3.4.0-preview2 — "tikkss (Tsutomu Katsube) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20796 has been reported by tikkss (Tsutomu Katsube).

10 messages 2024/10/13

[#119534] [Ruby master Bug#20800] Don't place `ruby` executable into `/usr/libexec/x86_64-linux/bin` — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20800 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

10 messages 2024/10/21

[#119575] [Ruby master Bug#20808] Cannot override Data#inspect — "maicolben (Maicol Bentancor) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20808 has been reported by maicolben (Maicol Bentancor).

8 messages 2024/10/21

[#119621] [Ruby master Bug#20816] Potential regression in Ruby 3.3.x (compared with 3.1 and 3.2) regarding fast syscalls and multi-threading. — "adrienjarthon (Adrien Jarthon) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIwODE2IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGFkcmllbmphcnRob24gKEFkcmllbiBK

6 messages 2024/10/25

[#119622] [Ruby master Bug#20817] Ruby 3.4.0dev emits `warning: possibly useless use of + in void context` while Ruby 3.3.5 does not — "yahonda (Yasuo Honda) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20817 has been reported by yahonda (Yasuo Honda).

8 messages 2024/10/26

[#119646] [Ruby master Feature#20855] Introduce `Fiber::Scheduler#blocking_region` to avoid stalling the event loop. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20855 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

10 messages 2024/10/31

[#119650] [Ruby master Bug#20857] Don't change `Hash#inspect formatting` — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20857 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

17 messages 2024/10/31

[ruby-core:119605] [Ruby master Feature#15381] Let double splat call `to_h` implicitly

From: "Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2024-10-24 11:33:15 UTC
List: ruby-core #119605
Issue #15381 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


Regarding `**@`, I'm not a big fan because `**` on the caller side is very much syntax a bit like a keyword, and it has the meaning the pass the Hash/expression as keyword arguments and not as a position argument.
Of course you could have `**` the syntax and `**@` the unary operator called by it, but effectively it's not really an operator in the sense of unary +/- or binary operators, e.g. it can only be used in calls and in Hash literals.

Regarding trying `to_hash` then `to_h` or vice-versa it will have some overhead for the second method being tried for non-Hash.

`foo(**obj.to_h)` doesn't sound too bad to me as I would expect it's needed in only a few places (compared to all `**hash` usages) and it's probably clearer what is happening that way if `obj` is not a Hash/to_hash.

----------------------------------------
Feature #15381: Let double splat call `to_h` implicitly
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15381#change-110227

* Author: sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)
* Status: Open
----------------------------------------
The single splat calls `to_a` implicitly on the object (if it is not an array already) so that, for example, we have the convenience of writing conditions in an array literal:

```ruby
a = [
  *(:foo if some_condition),
  *(:bar if another_condition),
]
```

And the ampersand implicitly calls `to_proc` on the object (if it is not a proc already) so that we can substitute a block with an ampersand followed by a symbol:

```ruby
some_method(&:some_method_name)
```

Unlike the single splat and ampersand, the double splat does not seem to implicitly call a corresponding method. I propose that the double splat should call `to_h` implicitly on the object if it not already a Hash so that we can, for example, write a condition in a hash literal as follows:

```ruby
h = {
  **({a: 1} if some_condition),
  **({b: 2) if another_condition),
}
```

There may be some other benefits of this feature that I have not noticed yet.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/


In This Thread

Prev Next