[#119637] Behavior of raising from rescue blocks when multiple rescue blocks exist — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
Hello, I couldn't find any documentation about the subject, so I thought
3 messages
2024/10/29
[ruby-core:119605] [Ruby master Feature#15381] Let double splat call `to_h` implicitly
From:
"Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date:
2024-10-24 11:33:15 UTC
List:
ruby-core #119605
Issue #15381 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
Regarding `**@`, I'm not a big fan because `**` on the caller side is very much syntax a bit like a keyword, and it has the meaning the pass the Hash/expression as keyword arguments and not as a position argument.
Of course you could have `**` the syntax and `**@` the unary operator called by it, but effectively it's not really an operator in the sense of unary +/- or binary operators, e.g. it can only be used in calls and in Hash literals.
Regarding trying `to_hash` then `to_h` or vice-versa it will have some overhead for the second method being tried for non-Hash.
`foo(**obj.to_h)` doesn't sound too bad to me as I would expect it's needed in only a few places (compared to all `**hash` usages) and it's probably clearer what is happening that way if `obj` is not a Hash/to_hash.
----------------------------------------
Feature #15381: Let double splat call `to_h` implicitly
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15381#change-110227
* Author: sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)
* Status: Open
----------------------------------------
The single splat calls `to_a` implicitly on the object (if it is not an array already) so that, for example, we have the convenience of writing conditions in an array literal:
```ruby
a = [
*(:foo if some_condition),
*(:bar if another_condition),
]
```
And the ampersand implicitly calls `to_proc` on the object (if it is not a proc already) so that we can substitute a block with an ampersand followed by a symbol:
```ruby
some_method(&:some_method_name)
```
Unlike the single splat and ampersand, the double splat does not seem to implicitly call a corresponding method. I propose that the double splat should call `to_h` implicitly on the object if it not already a Hash so that we can, for example, write a condition in a hash literal as follows:
```ruby
h = {
**({a: 1} if some_condition),
**({b: 2) if another_condition),
}
```
There may be some other benefits of this feature that I have not noticed yet.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/