[#118415] [Ruby master Bug#20601] Configuration flags are not properly propagated to assembler — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20601 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

7 messages 2024/07/02

[#118467] [Ruby master Feature#20610] Float::INFINITY as IO.select timeout argument — "akr (Akira Tanaka) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20610 has been reported by akr (Akira Tanaka).

8 messages 2024/07/07

[#118483] [Ruby master Bug#20614] Integer#size returns incorrect values on 64-bit Windows — surusek via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIwNjE0IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHN1cnVzZWsgKMWBdWthc3ogU3VyKS4N

10 messages 2024/07/08

[#118577] [Ruby master Bug#20631] Build failure with Xcode 16 beta and macOS 15 (Sequoia) Beta — "hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20631 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

9 messages 2024/07/12

[#118682] [Ruby master Misc#20652] Memory allocation for gsub has increased from Ruby 2.7 to 3.3 — "orisano (Nao Yonashiro) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20652 has been reported by orisano (Nao Yonashiro).

28 messages 2024/07/25

[ruby-core:118668] [Ruby master Bug#20433] Hash.inspect for some hash returns syntax invalid representation

From: "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2024-07-23 02:34:14 UTC
List: ruby-core #118668
Issue #20433 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).


IMO, this is a good chance to upgrade Hash#inspect format to adopt current Hash usage.

* symbol keys should be represented by "`key:`"
* ambiguous keys should be wrapped by (double) quotation marks
* spaces should be placed after "`:`" and around "`=>`".

I'd propose that we try new format for release candidates. If serious compatibility issues happen (although I don't believe we will see), we re-consider this change again.

Matz.


----------------------------------------
Bug #20433: Hash.inspect for some hash returns syntax invalid representation
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20433#change-109200

* Author: tompng (tomoya ishida)
* Status: Open
* Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
For these hashes, Hash.inspect returns a syntax invalid representation:
~~~ruby
{ :a! => 1 } # {:a!=>1}
{ :a? => 1 } # {:a?=>1}
{ :* => 1 }  # {:*=>1}
{ :== => 1 } # {:===>1}
{ :< => 1 }  # {:<=>1}
~~~
`eval(hash.inspect)` will raise SyntaxError.
Although inspect does not guarantee that the result can be eval-ed, it'd be confusing for these few cases.

Maybe related to https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20235



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/


In This Thread