From: sheepman <sheepman@...>
Date: 2007-08-05T13:30:56+09:00
Subject: Re: What libraries to be unbundled?

Hi,

I oppose the unbundle of webrick because webrick provides webrick/cgi, 
which is an alternative to cgi.rb. Alternatives to cgi.rb should be 
easily accessible as much as cgi.rb. 

And webrick/cgi requires a lot of .rb files in webrick itself. Separating 
webrick/cgi from webrick is inefficient.

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:59:53 +0900
"NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@sarion.co.jp> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Note that this topic is based on the premise bundling RubyGems with
> ruby/1.9.1.
> 
> A. What libraries to be unbundled at ruby/1.9.1?
> 
>   - soap4r
>   - tk
>   - webrick
>   - json
>   - yaml
>   - rss
> 
> 

-- 
sheepman / TAMURA Takashi
sheepman@sheepman.sakura.ne.jp