From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2007-07-30T04:45:09+09:00
Subject: Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML

On 7/29/07, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Robert Dober wrote:
> > On 7/29/07, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> >> Ryan Davis wrote:
> >>> please file this as a patch on the ruby project on rubyforge and
> >>> categorize it appropriately.
> >> But the OP should be aware that there is a bit of a backlog. There are
> >> limited programmer resources to handle patches, so putting the patches
> >> up on the ML is a good way to distribute them to those who want to
> >> monkey-patch. We should, IMO, keep sending patches to the ML (as well as
> >> to the rubyforge tracker).
> >>
> >> --
> >>        vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407
> >>
> >>
> > OP is not aware of anything, OP just wanted to share the code, that's
> > all folks...
> > I decided to do so in a form of a patch, if that was misleading, well,
> > OP apologizes.
>
> Sorry, Robert (I'll stop calling you "OP"--that's a bad habit!). I
No offense taken, but it was extremely funny to talk of myself as OP. :)
> didn't mean that to sound like a complaint. Realistically, if you want
> to benefit more users, please post to the ruby-talk ML (might be better
> than core for that purpose).
I cross posted, you are right posting to core was completely missleading ...
>I appreciate seeing patches like this, and
> probably others do as well.
Hmm I do not think it is a great achievement but than it was quite
some work to do, so I wanted to share. [ Why the hack did I not tell
this clearly the first time???? ]

Now if you really think there is some value in this I am glad to put
it into better form


Next time I will be clearer, your feedback was ok Jo�l, but clearer
the second time :)
R.
-- 
[...] as simple as possible, but no simpler.
-- Attributed to Albert Einstein