[#106341] [Ruby master Bug#18369] users.detect(:name, "Dorian") as shorthand for users.detect { |user| user.name == "Dorian" } — dorianmariefr <noreply@...>
Issue #18369 has been reported by dorianmariefr (Dorian Mari辿).
14 messages
2021/11/30
[#106351] [Ruby master Bug#18371] Release branches (release information in general) — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18371 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).
7 messages
2021/11/30
[ruby-core:106239] [Ruby master Feature#6733] New inspect framework
From:
"mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>
Date:
2021-11-24 05:06:43 UTC
List:
ruby-core #106239
Issue #6733 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote in #note-8:
> Should the (remaining) limit (of nb of characters) be passed to `inspect_to`?
> Otherwise if the logic is like creating a long string, and then appending to the buffer, we have the problem that it still takes a long time and might waste a lot of needless computation.
I don't think that your concern will be addressed even if limit is passed. The logic can still create a long string and then truncate it to fit with the limit. `inspect_to` should append small strings to the buffer, which should be noted as a best practice.
Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) wrote in #note-9:
> This sounds like a very powerful and flexible approach, but perhaps a little over-engineered?
> Maybe a more KISS approach would be sufficient; just define `Object#simple_inspect` to be used when we need a short string, like in `NoMethodError#message`.
Indeed this proposal was unearthed in the context of `NoMethodError#message` (#18285), but the use case is not limited to that.
----------------------------------------
Feature #6733: New inspect framework
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6733#change-94859
* Author: akr (Akira Tanaka)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
After we discussed http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6291 at a developer meeting,
we re-realized new inspect framework may be useful.
Problem:
* inspect method may generate too long string but sometimes whole string is not required.
For example, first 70 characters are enough for error messages (backtrace).
* inspect can't know a encoding to be expected.
* inspect generates may short strings and discard them immediately.
If we have a new method, inspect_to(buffer), and
it (or overridden method in subclass) adds the inspected result to buffer,
we can solve above problems.
buffer has a method, <<.
It may be a string, IO or other object.
For too long string, buffer itself can throw (or raise) when buffered output is reached to a specified limit.
For encoding, buffer can record an encoding.
(p method creates a buffer object using $stdout's encoding.)
For small strings, in C level, we can create a rb_buffer_add(VALUE buffer, const char *p, long len) and
it don't need to allocate a String object.
This is big change but we can preserve compatibility by following default inspect_to method:
class Object
def inspect_to(buffer)
buffer << self.inspect
end
end
If legacy class which has inspect but not inspect_to,
Object#inspect_to calls inspect and use the result.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>