[#106341] [Ruby master Bug#18369] users.detect(:name, "Dorian") as shorthand for users.detect { |user| user.name == "Dorian" } — dorianmariefr <noreply@...>
Issue #18369 has been reported by dorianmariefr (Dorian Mari辿).
14 messages
2021/11/30
[#106351] [Ruby master Bug#18371] Release branches (release information in general) — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18371 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).
7 messages
2021/11/30
[ruby-core:106007] [Ruby master Feature#18033] Time.new to parse a string
From:
"byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>
Date:
2021-11-10 11:26:45 UTC
List:
ruby-core #106007
Issue #18033 has been updated by byroot (Jean Boussier).
If I might add a nitpick, the actual format is RFC 3339, which is pretty much a subset of ISO 8601.
But yes, +1 to making `Time.iso8601` a core method.
----------------------------------------
Feature #18033: Time.new to parse a string
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18033#change-94556
* Author: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Make `Time.new` parse `Time#inspect` and ISO-8601 like strings.
* `Time.iso8601` and `Time.parse` need an extension library, `date`.
* `Time.iso8601` can't parse `Time#inspect` string.
* `Time.parse` often results in unintentional/surprising results.
* `Time.new` also about 1.9 times faster than `Time.iso8601`.
```
$ ./ruby -rtime -rbenchmark -e '
n = 1000
s = Time.now.iso8601
Benchmark.bm(12) do |x|
x.report("Time.iso8601") {n.times{Time.iso8601(s)}}
x.report("Time.parse") {n.times{Time.parse(s)}}
x.report("Time.new") {n.times{Time.new(s)}}
end'
user system total real
Time.iso8601 0.006919 0.000185 0.007104 ( 0.007091)
Time.parse 0.018338 0.000207 0.018545 ( 0.018590)
Time.new 0.003671 0.000069 0.003740 ( 0.003741)
```
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4639
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>