[#105544] [Ruby master Feature#18239] Variable Width Allocation: Strings — "peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18239 has been reported by peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu).

18 messages 2021/10/04

[#105566] [Ruby master Bug#18242] Parser makes multiple assignment sad in confusing way — "danh337 (Dan Higgins)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18242 has been reported by danh337 (Dan Higgins).

9 messages 2021/10/06

[#105573] [Ruby master Bug#18243] Ractor.make_shareable does not freeze the receiver of a Proc but allows accessing ivars of it — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18243 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

11 messages 2021/10/06

[#105618] [Ruby master Bug#18249] The ABI version of dev builds of CRuby does not correspond to the ABI — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18249 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

23 messages 2021/10/11

[#105626] [Ruby master Bug#18250] Anonymous variables seem to break `Ractor.make_shareable` — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18250 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

14 messages 2021/10/12

[#105660] [Ruby master Feature#18254] Add an `offset` parameter to String#unpack and String#unpack1 — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18254 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

13 messages 2021/10/18

[#105672] [Ruby master Feature#18256] Change the canonical name of Thread::Mutex, Thread::Queue, Thread::SizedQueue and Thread::ConditionVariable to just Mutex, Queue, SizedQueue and ConditionVariable — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18256 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

6 messages 2021/10/19

[#105692] [Ruby master Bug#18257] SystemTap/DTrace coredump on ppc64le/s390x — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18257 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

22 messages 2021/10/20

[#105781] [Ruby master Misc#18266] DevelopersMeeting20211118Japan — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18266 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

13 messages 2021/10/25

[#105805] [Ruby master Bug#18270] Refinement#{extend_object, append_features, prepend_features} should be removed — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18270 has been reported by shugo (Shugo Maeda).

8 messages 2021/10/26

[#105826] [Ruby master Feature#18273] Class.subclasses — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18273 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

35 messages 2021/10/27

[#105833] [Ruby master Feature#18275] Add an option to define_method to not capture the surrounding environment — "vinistock (Vinicius Stock)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18275 has been reported by vinistock (Vinicius Stock).

11 messages 2021/10/27

[#105853] [Ruby master Feature#18276] `Proc#bind_call(obj)` same as `obj.instance_exec(..., &proc_obj)` — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18276 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

15 messages 2021/10/28

[ruby-core:105820] [Ruby master Feature#18137] A new method to check Proc is isolated or not

From: "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2021-10-27 07:30:23 UTC
List: ruby-core #105820
Issue #18137 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).


I'm afraid that we can define "Isolated Proc".

As I know there are several versions.

1) self
a: self is shareable
b: self is not shareable

2) reference to outer scope variables
x: no references
y: has references, but read-only and values are fixed (if outer-scope variables are modified by other code, but keep to refer original values).
z: has references, but the variable storage is independent from outer-scope.

example of y:


```ruby
i = 1
pr = proc{
  p i #=> always 1
}
i = 2
pr.call #=> 1
```

example of z:

```ruby
i = 1
pr = proc{
  p i += 1
}
i += 10
pr.call #=> 2
```

----

From Ractor perspective, x and y are acceptable. for a and b,
Ractor doesn't care because the self will be replaced with `Ractor.new{}` and `define_method`. `Proc#call` is not allowed (!! Now it is allowed. BUG!! https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18243).



----------------------------------------
Feature #18137: A new method to check Proc is isolated or not
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18137#change-94344

* Author: tagomoris (Satoshi TAGOMORI)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
I want to check a Proc is isolated or not, like `Proc#isolated?`.

Proc objects are passed to libraries very often. For example, Rack web application is a callable (`respond_to(:call)`) object, and it may be a Proc.
When the library will call that Proc object in a Ractor, the passed Proc should be isolated by `Ractor.make_shareable()`. Otherwise, it causes RuntimeError.

So I want to check the Proc object is isolated or not earlier. It should be very helpful for library users because of the early and clear error messages.




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next