From: mame@... Date: 2021-06-17T09:25:08+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:104337] [Ruby master Feature#12913] A way to configure the default maximum width of pp Issue #12913 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). We discussed this issue in today's dev-meeting. @akr suggested that 1. To make the default size to be io/console's winsize (width) 2. Instead of changing `Kernel#pp`, extend `PP.pp` to accept keywords `out` and `width` 3. If we want `width=1`, define another new method like `PP.fully_expanded_pp(obj)` or something (Note that there is already `PP.singleline_pp(obj)`) and we agreed with them. I'll commit a change for 1 later. I am happy to create another patch for 2 and 3. Anyone have an idea about the name of `fully_expanded_pp`? ---------------------------------------- Feature #12913: A way to configure the default maximum width of pp https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12913#change-92558 * Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh) * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) ---------------------------------------- How about having an easy way to configure the maximum width of a line of `pp` output? Currently, `pp` accepts the maximum width as an optional argument: pp(big_array, $>, 120) However, this is obviously too long for a useful debugging-purpose method like `pp`. Even worse, we must add the fragment "`, $>, 120`" to all calls to `pp`. I don't feel this is reasonable. The patch attached provides `PP.default_maxwidth=` and `PP.default_maxwidth`, which can be used to configure the default setting of the maxwidth. PP.default_maxwidth = 1 pp([1, 2, 3]) #=> [1, # 2, # 3] Akr-san, what do you think? ---Files-------------------------------- pp-default-maxwidth.patch (1.05 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: